Source : the age
By Victoria Ward
Podcast staff needed “long-term therapy” or took extended breaks from work after working with Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex, Vanity Fair has reported.
The magazine recounts a source alleging that the strain Meghan put on her colleagues when things went wrong was “really, really, really awful” and “very painful”.
The Vanity Fair profile portrays Harry and Meghan as a couple who didn’t fully understand the cut-throat world of show business and had few good ideas.Credit: Getty Images
“She’s constantly playing checkers – I’m not even going to say chess – but she’s just very aware of where everybody is on her board,” the source told the publication.
“And when you are not in, you are to be thrown to the wolves at any given moment.”
The allegations come in a lengthy profile of the duke and duchess marking the fifth anniversary of their departure from the UK.
The high-profile magazine says it spent months speaking to dozens of people who have lived and worked with the Sussexes to establish how their new life has panned out.
Two sources said a colleague who had ties to Meghan’s Archetypes podcast took a leave of absence after working on three episodes.
The 8000-word cover feature paints a picture of a couple whose approach to their new careers in the world of show business has not always been well received.
Prince Harry is portrayed as a naive, lonely figure who has failed to make any friends and is desperate to reconnect with his family.
One source suggested that Harry did not necessarily realise the powerful impact that his tell-all memoir, Spare, would have.
The duke’s idea for a Spotify podcast is gently mocked.
Dubbed a “sociopath podcast”, he reportedly wanted to interview powerful men with complicated stories such as Vladimir Putin, Donald Trump and Mark Zuckerberg, about how their experiences turned them into sociopaths.
The duke reportedly said: “I have very bad childhood trauma. Obviously. My mother was essentially murdered. What is it about me that didn’t make me one of these bad guys?”
Meanwhile, Meghan is portrayed as a ruthless boss who treats those who fail to impress her with contempt.
One person is quoted as saying that this manifested as “undermining”. “It’s talking behind your back. It’s gnawing at your sense of self. Really, like, Mean Girls-teenager,” they said.
One source told the magazine: “You don’t tell the couple ‘no’“, and said: “I left because I couldn’t live with myself any more.”
The allegations are reminiscent of previous bullying claims made against the duchess, which have always been hotly denied.
In 2018, Meghan was the subject of a palace bullying complaint amid concerns “that the duchess was able to bully two PAs out of the household”.
The findings of an official investigation into the way Buckingham Palace handled the 2018 allegations was kept secret.
On settling in the United States in 2020, the duke and duchess signed lucrative deals with both Netflix and Spotify as they sought financial independence.
Vanity Fair quotes one person who was excited to work with the couple on media projects and did not believe reports that Meghan had bullied palace aides.
After working with her, this person realised, “Oh, any given Tuesday, this happened”, it is alleged.
“You can be yelled at even if somebody doesn’t raise their voice. [It’s] funny that people don’t differentiate between the energy of being yelled at and literally somebody screaming at you,” the source said.
Two sources claimed that one colleague who had ties to Meghan’s Archetypes podcast – released in 2022 – took a leave of absence after working on just three episodes.
‘And when you are not in, you are to be thrown to the wolves at any given moment.’
A source alleges Meghan undermined staff she worked with on podcasts
“Several others” are said to have described “taking extended breaks from work to escape scrutiny, exiting their job, or undergoing long-term therapy after working with Meghan”.
One told Vanity Fair: “I think if Meghan acknowledged her own shortcomings or personal contributions to situations rather than staying trapped in a victim narrative, her perception might be better.”
Not for the first time, the duke and duchess are portrayed as a couple who didn’t fully understand the cut-throat world of show business and had few good ideas.
Among the podcast ideas pitched to Harry were said to be one that involved him reviewing a hot chocolate every week while chatting with a different friend, and another that had him “fix” something each week, from a flat tyre to global warming.
Harry with children in Canada in November at a launch of the Invictus Games school program.Credit: Canadian Press
One former Spotify employee is quoted: “He [Harry] wanted to do a podcast about disabled people who compete in the Invictus Games. But there’s no crossover between the audience who would listen to that and people who want to hear about Harry’s life.”
The duke is described as someone who does not enjoy fame and would “happily work for charities for the rest of his life and would be very happy if Meghan made all the money and he didn’t need to”.
“I think Harry doesn’t know what he wants because he grew up in a fishbowl, and so he doesn’t know what real life really is,” one source told the magazine.
“I think he probably wants to be left alone and be able to go kiss babies every once in a while but not have to worry about money. I don’t think he wants to be famous the way Meghan wants to be famous.
“I can picture him meeting Meghan and being just a deep breath of, like: ‘I’ve been so exhausted, and you make everything so easy …’ I don’t want to be like, oh, it’s an Oedipus thing or whatever, but it kind of feels like she’s re-parenting him in a way.”
The duke and duchess’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
