The Delhi High Court has recently addressed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by the National Students’ Union of India (NSUI), alleging significant irregularities and technical failures in the Central Board of Secondary Education’s (CBSE) On-Screen Marking (OSM) system used for evaluating Class 12 examination answer sheets. ([indianexpress.com](https://indianexpress.com/article/legal-news/delhi-high-court-notice-cbse-centre-nsui-plea-on-screen-marking-system-10729757/lite/?utm_source=openai))
**Background of the Case**
The NSUI, the student wing of the Congress party, has raised concerns about the fairness and transparency of the OSM system, which was introduced by CBSE to digitize the evaluation process. The PIL highlights issues such as blurred scans, missing pages, incomplete uploads, and mismatched answer sheets, which allegedly led to incorrect marks for students. ([mid-day.com](https://www.mid-day.com/news/india-news/article/cbse-osm-row-nsui-moves-delhi-hc-raising-concerns-over-on-screen-marking-system-for-class-12-exams-23633305?utm_source=openai))
**Allegations and Relief Sought**
The petitioners have sought directions from the court to award compensatory marks to students whose answer scripts were missing, blurred, or incorrectly evaluated. They have also requested an independent inquiry into the alleged irregularities, technical deficiencies, and grievance-handling failures associated with the OSM system. Additionally, the petitioners have urged the court to direct CBSE to keep the verification and re-evaluation portal open for an additional month to enable affected students to pursue remedies. ([barandbench.com](https://www.barandbench.com/news/nsui-moves-delhi-high-court-over-cbse-osm-row-seeks-probe?utm_source=openai))
**CBSE’s Response**
During the court proceedings, CBSE’s counsel, M.A. Niyazi, opposed the PIL on the grounds of its maintainability, arguing that the petitioner is a student wing of a political party and that educational matters should not be politicized. Niyazi further stated that the board has been engaging with students and has extended the deadline for the verification and re-evaluation portal on several occasions.
**Court’s Directive**
Despite CBSE’s objections, the Division Bench comprising Justices Neena Bansal Krishna and Madhu Jain issued notices to CBSE and the Central Government, seeking their responses to the PIL. The court has scheduled the next hearing for June 12, 2026. ([hindustantimes.com](https://www.hindustantimes.com/education/news/delhi-hc-seeks-response-from-centre-cbse-on-petition-of-nsui-in-osm-marking-matter-101780908984525.html?utm_source=openai))
**Implications for Students**
The outcome of this case holds significant implications for the thousands of students who have raised concerns about the OSM system. If the court directs CBSE to address the alleged irregularities, it could lead to a more transparent and reliable evaluation process, ensuring that students’ academic futures are not adversely affected by technical glitches or procedural shortcomings.
**Conclusion**
The Delhi High Court’s intervention in this matter underscores the importance of maintaining integrity and transparency in educational evaluation systems. As the case progresses, it is crucial for all stakeholders to collaborate in ensuring that the evaluation process is fair, accurate, and free from technical errors, thereby upholding the credibility of the educational system.
This article is AI-generated content. Please verify the information independently before taking any action based on this article.
