Source : Perth Now news
Hundreds of University of Sydney staff will walk off the job over stalled enterprise agreement talks covering job security and AI protections.
The campus has urged non-union staff and students to work and study from home in preparation for the widespread disruption on Wednesday.
The 24-hour strike comes after bargaining talks between management and the union stalled over issues including job security, casual employment and protections around artificial intelligence.
Members of the National Tertiary Education Union (NTEU) will stop work for the day after negotiations over a new enterprise agreement reached a deadlock.
It is expected most teaching staff will still be able to hold classes online in a bid to limit the impact on students.
A University of Sydney spokesperson said staff and students had been advised to stay off campus where possible on Wednesday.
“(We) expect the majority of teaching staff to be able to hold their classes online to minimise disruption for students,” the spokesperson said.
Building access is expected to be restricted, with student or staff ID required, while some labs and other activities that cannot be done remotely may be cancelled.
The union has framed the dispute as a broader fight over the future of university work, arguing staff want a greater role in major decisions that affect jobs and teaching.
NTEU NSW Division Secretary Vince Caughley said the strike would go ahead “after negotiations reached an impasse on key claims” including decasualisation, job security, protections around AI and disability rights.
“At its heart, this dispute is about job security and who gets to decide the future of our universities,” Mr Caughley told NewsWire.
“Our members have watched secure jobs disappear through years of restructures, casualisation and cost-cutting.
“Now management is rushing headlong into AI, something its own Green Paper describes as one of the most consequential transformations in the history of higher education, without the evidence, consultation or due diligence a change of that magnitude demands,” he said.
Mr Caughley said the union was seeking stronger guarantees around how AI could be used, including consultation on meaningful systems, transparency around decisions and protections for staff image, voice and intellectual property.
The university, however, made clear the industrial action would not alter its approach to negotiations, while maintaining it would keep engaging in talks.
“Industrial action won’t influence the way we reach agreement with the NTEU and we believe their stop work action is premature, however we support the right of union members to take protected industrial action and we’re continuing to engage at the bargaining table, from where our agreement will be driven,” the spokesperson said.
The university also defended its approach to AI, stating it believed the technology must be used ethically and in a way that benefits the broader university community.
“We agree using AI ethically requires a human-centred approach and our Responsible AI Framework, principles and guardrails that govern use have been developed with this as a key value,” the spokesperson said.
“AI is undeniably changing the modern workforce and we consider it our responsibility to make sure our staff have the opportunities and capabilities they need to drive our research, education and operations and to ensure our students and graduates have the capabilities they need for the workplaces of the future.”
The university said it was also investing heavily in staff training and had put safeguards in place around privacy, ethics and academic integrity.
Mr Caughley also linked the dispute to wider concerns about governance in higher education, arguing staff were resisting a model that had already come under scrutiny.
“We’re not giving that management model a blank cheque to use AI to accelerate the hollowing out of university jobs and education,” he said.
“Our members care deeply about their work, their students and the public good universities are supposed to serve. This is bigger than protecting our own jobs. It is about protecting what a university is.
“Sydney should be leading the sector out of this governance crisis, not demonstrating why it exists.”
